why do scientists share and compare data

The term ' creation scientist ' is somewhat of a misnomer in that  the two words seem to contradict one another. However, there are  scientists/researchers that will readily
admit that their findings,  both geological and archaelogical can be directly paralleled to the  teachings of the Bible. For instance, we are taught that God  created the first generations of all living things. The fossil  record seems to confirm this. For a long time [ a geological  moment] there was absolutely nothing on the earth.


Then suddenly  there was an abundance of life, plants, insects, animals and  dinosaurs. We are also taught that a great worldwide flood  destroyed the earth and that it was '. without form and void' of  life. Again, the fossil records clearly indicates that such an  event did actually occur. So certainly, there can be a sort of  coexistence between science and creation.   The word 'secular' can be defined as 'not specifically religious'.  Secular science is basic General Science without a religious  influence.


In much the same way that secular music is not  necessarily religious music, secular science is not a religious  discipline in that it does not involve, and is not bound by any  monastic views or principles. Answer   A creation scientist would be a scientist that believes that  something created the universe, while a secular scientist would  probably not believe that, but would say that everything occurred  by chance or natural processes.    Both scientists can still be "genuine" and relatively objective,  but are looking at the problems from differing points of view.


Both  types of scientists, and indeed all people, have their own separate  ways of looking at the world.   Science, n. Investigation of natural phenomena.   Engineering, n. Domestication of natural phenomena.   Technology, n. Domesticated natural phenomena.     Another Answer    "Creation scientists" have no concern about natural phenomena, just  the supernatural phenomena described in the Bible.


They aren't  scientists. Peer reviewed means that the paper is analyzed by fellow scientists, who evaluate the methods used and identify any potential flaws in logic or methodology that might shed doubt on the findings. Publishing results of research projects in peer-reviewed journals enables the scientific and medical community to evaluate the findings themselves. It also provides instructions so that other researchers can repeat the experiment or build on it to verify and confirm the results.


Researchers publication records carry a great deal of weight when they apply for academic posts or research grants, and in their reputation in the scientific community. Visit to read the latest articles about multiple sclerosis. Researchers also share results at national and international meetings and workshops, which are vital to building collaborations and stimulating cross-fertilization of ideas and methods.